It was one of the most exclusive tickets in town: Only 800 were made available, and those lucky enough to score one had to show photo ID at the gate, where they were issued a wristband and a number. No signs bigger than a sheet of notebook paper were allowed, so as not to obscure anyone’s view.
The rules weren’t for a rock concert but for a town hall meeting the evening of April 12 in Aurora between Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Coffman and constituents.
Town halls have become a risky proposition for GOP members of Congress since President Donald Trump’s election. Liberal groups and constituents angry about the Trump agenda have flooded public meetings, asking their representatives tough questions, chanting, heckling them and even shouting them down in skirmishes that have made for embarrassing online video.
As a result, some Republicans aren’t holding town halls. And some of those who are going ahead with such events are taking steps to keep things from getting out of control.
In Texas, Rep. John Culberson barred signs and noisemakers from a March 24 town hall, required those attending to prove they were constituents by showing utility bills or other documents, and insisted that questions be submitted in advance. He was still shouted down repeatedly by a crowd angry about the GOP push to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
In Arkansas, Rep. French Hill scheduled his first town hall of the year for April 17 — but in the middle of the afternoon on a weekday, and with the state’s Republican junior senator, Tom Cotton, at his side. Nevada’s Dean Heller, one of the more vulnerable GOP senators in 2018, also scheduled his first town hall of 2017 for April 17, in the morning. And he, too, is apparently seeking safety in numbers by including Republican Rep. Mark Amodei.
Democrats, for their part, have felt the heat from anti-Trump constituents at town halls and are also taking precautions. Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris of California, for example, banned signs at her town hall in Los Angeles this week.
Coffman is a politician perennially on the hot seat in the 6th Congressional District, which encompasses Aurora, Centennial, Highlands Ranch, Littleton and parts of Adams County, among other areas. His swing district has slightly more Democrats than Republicans, and he is always a top target in elections. For years, he has avoided town halls, instead holding private, one-on-one meetings with constituents during “office hours”’ at libraries in his district.
In January, one of those events was flooded by hundreds of constituents and activists who filled the library lobby, sang, chanted and demanded Coffman emerge from his private conversations to address them. The congressman ended up slipping out the back.
One of the rules for his April 12 town hall was no standing in the aisles or blocking entrances and exits.
The contentious town hall was moderated by a local radio host Steffan Tubbs, who voted for Coffman and urged hecklers to “respect the guidelines.” Coffman earned some cheers when he spoke of his support for rights for gays and immigrants.
But he also got a fair amount of scorn from those who contended he was not standing up enough to Trump.
“When I disagree with the president, I will speak out,” Coffman said in response to a pointed question about his support for Trump-backed legislation. “But I’m not going to do it every day. ... Those of you on the extreme left will never be satisfied until Trump” leaves office.
Smadar Belkind Gerson, an activist in Coffman’s district who was helping to organize protests outside the town hall, said that she was glad Coffman moved to a more open format but that he has a long way to go. The event, she noted, was scheduled to last only an hour — though Coffman stayed for nearly a second hour — and Coffman’s staff planned to draw numbers to determine which constituent could ask questions.
“Yes, people are upset,” Gerson said. “But the more you do this and the more you restrict people, the more they will be upset.”
Coffman held two town halls via telephone before the April 12 in-person event. Those appearances are far more controlled, with questions submitted in advance and an operator cutting off the questioner so the politician can respond.