DNA questions arise in case

Posted 5/7/13

Questions concerning DNA contamination were raised during Friday’s motions hearing in the Austin Sigg homicide case. Sigg is accused of murdering …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Username
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

DNA questions arise in case

Posted

Questions concerning DNA contamination were raised during Friday’s motions hearing in the Austin Sigg homicide case.

Sigg is accused of murdering 10-year-old Jessica Ridgeway in October 2012 in Westminster.

Last month he entered a not guilty plea, despite an alleged confession and the discovery of her remains in his home.

He faces life in prison with parole after 40 years.

According to the prosecution, a contamination memo does not mean contamination did in fact occur, it just means contamination was possible.

The 18-year-old’s defense team asked for documents from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation concerning DNA samples taken by bureau in the case.

According to the defense team, three contamination memos were produced Oct. 23-26, 2012, regarding DNA samples in two cases.

Two memos were connected to the DNA in the Jessica Ridgeway case, who was abducted and murdered last October, and one memo was connected to the Kentner Lake jogger case, in which Sigg is accused of attempting to kidnap a woman over Memorial Day weekend last year.

Sigg’s defense team filed a motion for validation of the DNA samples and a review of the machines used to test the samples.

The machines haven’t been reviewed since 2010, when CBI began using the machines, but regular maintenance is done and protocols of the machines are met daily.

CBI lab director Kathleen Fetherston testified during the hearing describing how the machines work and how DNA contamination is possible.

A second motions hearing is scheduled for 9 a.m. on June 21.

#topsix, sigg, murder, dna contamination, jessica ridgeway, westminster, cbi

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.